It is for these and related reasons that not every attorney in every firm is a proper fit for a client. Dixon & Moseley, P.C. does not strive to represent every person and attend to all legal needs, nor is our philosophy the right one for every type of case or client.  What we do, we strive to do very well. Typically, our representation focuses on cases that do not neatly fit within any one legal area or those that appear to have no viable legal remedy.

However, law inherently involves conflict and the potential for an adverse outcome. It is for this reason that our firm’s philosophy, standing alone, is insufficient for any use of this site to make an informed choice; this is to the end of ensuring that whatever the outcome, the client is satisfied that all that could be done, or should have been done, was considered by a skilled attorney taking a reasoned approach.

Ultimately, this comes down to a mind set:  We believe that attorneys and their clients should have similar views regarding the controlling dynamics and legal issues of the case. Where the positions are in fundamental conflict, the representation should be cautiously considered and undertaken only in one rare circumstance: if each has respectful and reasonable, albeit different, positions that foster critical development of the case.

Dixon & Moseley, P.C.’s principals, Julie Dixon and Alex Moseley, thus share in this part of the firm’s website what they believe makes them effective advocates – perhaps your advocates. Above all, for this approach to be effective, it requires extensive client involvement and open lines of communication – a partnership and decentralized working relationship. This creates a unique legal synergy to the end of addressing the client’s objectives.

This is the essence of Dixon & Moseley, P.C. and its attorneys.