Call Now

Call Now

Call Now


After a hearing, how long should you expect a ruling in a domestic case?

In domestic law cases, whether it is a pending divorce, a child custody case, or child support modification, many litigants are anxious to find out how the judge will rule. Oftentimes there is a lot of information presented by way of exhibits and testimony at a hearing. Sometimes, hearings can be just a few hours, and other times hearings will stretch on for 3 or 4 days, spanning several months. This can be very frustrating to a parent who is seeking to exercise more time with his or her child, or change custody and remove the child from what that parent believes is a bad situation. So the question arises, just how much time should a judge take to rule on a case?

While many cases, such as protective orders, or misdemeanor criminal cases, the judge may rule from the bench immediately following closing arguments from the attorneys, with such high stakes (the future health and welfare of minor children), lengthy hearings, and copious amounts of evidence, a judge may be reluctant to make a snap decision. When this happens, which is often the case in the domestic arena, a judge will conclude the hearing by stating “I will take this under advisement.” What this means is that the judge, in theory, will take some time to go over his or her notes from the trial, relook at all the evidence, and consider very carefully his or her decision. While this extended wait may be very frustrating for a parent, it is often important for the judge to take his or her time in really making the best decision he or she sees fit for the matter before the court.

At some point, after anxiously awaiting a decision from the judge, when should attorneys and litigants become concerned that the decision is taking too long?

Pursuant to Indiana Trial Rule 53.2,(QUOTE 1) titled “Time for holding issue under advisement; delay of entering a judgment,” a judge has 90 days to issue a ruling on all matters (motions and issues brought before the court) in a given case, after he or she takes the matter under advisement. If a judge does not issue a ruling within this specified time the pending issues and case may be withdrawn from the judge, and transferred to the Supreme Court of Indiana for appointment of a special judge.(QUOTE 2)

In a recently decided case from the Indiana Court of Appeals, In Re the Paternity of V.A., the trial court had several pending motions before it, such as the Petition to Establish Paternity, Custody, and Parenting Time, Petition for Contempt and Request for the Return of Property. The trial court issued its order, within the specified 90 days, but the Court of Appeals held that the trial court did not rule on ALL pending motions, and therefore, did not comply with Trial Rule 53.2. The Court of Appeals remanded the case back to the trial court for a ruling on the petitions and motions that it failed to issue any ruling on in its final order, namely legal custody and the Petition for Contempt. The Court of Appeals noted that specifically with respect to the Petition for Contempt, the trial court has the discretion to find a party in contempt, or not, but the opinion of the Court of Appeals indicates that the trial court must indicate its determination, and must still state its finding, even if it does not find that the party is in contempt.

We hope that this blog post has been helpful in understanding why the trial court sometimes takes matters under advisement rather than ruling immediately, and the timing for issuing a final order. Ciyou & Dixon, P.C. practices throughout the state of Indiana. This blog post was written by attorney, Lori Schmeltzer.

  1. Trial Rule 53.2
  2. Trial Rule 53.2(A)

We Listen & Care

Proven & experienced attorneys successfully advocating & resolving complex cases for over 25 years

Quick Contact

Need to talk now? Fill out the quick form below and we will contact you directly.
Blog Categories

Get In Touch

We're available to answer your questions 24/7.

Contact Us

Please fill out the form below and we will be in touch with you shortly.

Dixon & Moseley, P.C., is a law firm located in Indianapolis, Indiana. We serve clients in six core practice areas: family lawappellate practicefirearms lawgeneral practicepersonal injury and criminal law.

Call Now

Copyright © 2024 Ciyou & Dixon, P.C., Attorneys at Law. All rights reserved. This Site does not provide legal advice; please review the disclaimer for other limitations. Privacy Policy

Based in Indianapolis and founded in 1995, Dixon & Moseley, P.C. is a niche law firm focused on successfully dealing with the complexities of divorce, high-conflict child custody and family law. Known for their ability to solve extremely complex situations with high quality work and responsiveness, Dixon & Moseley, P.C. will guide you every step of the way. The family law attorneys at Dixon & Moseley, P.C. will help you precisely identify your objectives and the means to reach your desired result. Life is uncertain. Be certain of your counsel. Indianapolis Divorce Attorneys, Dixon & Moseley, P.C.

Indianapolis Divorce Attorneys, Dixon & Moseley, P.C. of Indianapolis, Indiana, offers legal services for Indianapolis, Zionsville, Noblesville, Carmel, Avon, Anderson, Danville, Greenwood, Brownsburg, Geist, Fortville, McCordsville, Muncie, Greenfield, Westfield, Fort Wayne, Fishers, Bloomington, Lafayette, Marion County, Hamilton County, Hendricks County, Allen County, Delaware County, Morgan County, Hendricks County, Boone County, Vigo County, Johnson County, Hancock County, and Tippecanoe County, Indiana.