Call Now

Call Now

Call Now


What Are The Limits On My Evidence In Child Custody Modification Proceedings?

What Are The Limits On My Evidence In Child Custody Modification Proceedings?

While many types of evidence might help establish a substantial change1 to modify physical custody, some key statutory and evidentiary rules may help you understand how or if your proposed “evidence” might be offered and admitted at trial. For instance, a child’s attendance records, if he or she has excessive absences, may be evidence to show a substantial change, as the custodial parent is not getting the child to school. However, all evidence has rules governing if it can be used. In this blog post, three (3) key limits on evidence in child custody modification proceedings are analyzed.

The first is relevancy.2 In order for any evidence to be admitted in a child custody modification proceeding, it must be relevant to a modification of physical custody being in the child’s best interests. Evidence is relevant if it has any tendency to make a fact more or less probable than it would be without the evidence; and the fact is of consequence in determining the action. So in a modification proceeding, a child’s favorite color would not be relevant. How a child is doing in school in a given parent’s custody is relevant.

The second is authentication. Taking the example already noted. The school attendance records could and probably are relevant in a child physical custody modification action. However, they are inadmissible hearsay unless accompanied by a statement of the record-keeper to authenticate the records. The statement of the record keeper must be made by someone with knowledge that the record was kept in the course of a regularly conducted activity of a business or organization and making the record was a regular practice of the business.3

The third (and type of evidence that trips a lot of litigants up in court) is the evidence relevant to the custody modification must be evidence that occurred after the last custody order. The court ordinarily cannot hear evidence on a matter occurring before the last custody proceeding between the parties unless the matter relates to a change in the factors relating to the best interests of the child. In other words, if the evidence of a DUI was used in the last custody proceeding, it probably cannot be considered the present modification action.4

As these rules may suggest, preparing a successful custody modification proceeding is a significant amount of work to identify the evidence and get it into an admissible format. In addition, taken on the whole, it must demonstrate a substantial change in circumstances and be in the child’s best interests to be successful. This is where a skilled lawyer can help you evaluate your physical modification objective and then assemble and present your evidence in a way that gives you the best chance of success. Ciyou & Dixon, P.C. advocates handle child custody modification cases and all other types of domestic law across the state. This blog is written for general educational purposes only. It is not intended as specific legal advice or a solicitation for services. It is an advertisement.

  1. Indiana Code section 31-17-2-21.
  2. Indiana Rule of Evidence 401.
  3. Indiana Rule of Evidence 806(6).
  4. Indiana Code section 31-17-2-21(c).

We Listen & Care

Proven & experienced attorneys successfully advocating & resolving complex cases for over 25 years

Quick Contact

Need to talk now? Fill out the quick form below and we will contact you directly.
Blog Categories

Get In Touch

We're available to answer your questions 24/7.

Contact Us

Please fill out the form below and we will be in touch with you shortly.

Dixon & Moseley, P.C., is a law firm located in Indianapolis, Indiana. We serve clients in six core practice areas: family lawappellate practicefirearms lawgeneral practicepersonal injury and criminal law.

Call Now

Copyright © 2024 Ciyou & Dixon, P.C., Attorneys at Law. All rights reserved. This Site does not provide legal advice; please review the disclaimer for other limitations. Privacy Policy

Based in Indianapolis and founded in 1995, Dixon & Moseley, P.C. is a niche law firm focused on successfully dealing with the complexities of divorce, high-conflict child custody and family law. Known for their ability to solve extremely complex situations with high quality work and responsiveness, Dixon & Moseley, P.C. will guide you every step of the way. The family law attorneys at Dixon & Moseley, P.C. will help you precisely identify your objectives and the means to reach your desired result. Life is uncertain. Be certain of your counsel. Indianapolis Divorce Attorneys, Dixon & Moseley, P.C.

Indianapolis Divorce Attorneys, Dixon & Moseley, P.C. of Indianapolis, Indiana, offers legal services for Indianapolis, Zionsville, Noblesville, Carmel, Avon, Anderson, Danville, Greenwood, Brownsburg, Geist, Fortville, McCordsville, Muncie, Greenfield, Westfield, Fort Wayne, Fishers, Bloomington, Lafayette, Marion County, Hamilton County, Hendricks County, Allen County, Delaware County, Morgan County, Hendricks County, Boone County, Vigo County, Johnson County, Hancock County, and Tippecanoe County, Indiana.