Call Now

Call Now

Call Now


When Evidence May Be Suppressed in A Criminal Case and What It Means

When Evidence May Be Suppressed in A Criminal Case and What It Means

Suppression of evidence in a criminal case has always been a controversial topic and legal remedy. An example would be suppression of a firearm found on a felon after he or she is stopped and searched. It is illegal and a criminal act for a felon to possess a firearm under state and federal law, and standing alone, is criminal and should result in a conviction.

The reason evidence is suppressed, such as this hypothetical firearm on a felon, is to make sure our constitutional safeguards are not violated. This often means a defendant—guilt notwithstanding—is not convicted. Suppression is a matter considered by every defense attorney and the topic of this blog post.1 This also shows how technical criminal law is and the need for skilled legal defense counsel when faced with a criminal allegation or charge (or indictment).

Perhaps the most common situation where a defense attorney moves to suppress evidence is where the police obtain this from searching a home. Under the Fourth Amendment, the police may not just choose to search someone’s home because they believe criminal activity is occurring. If they have “probable cause” to believe criminal activity is occurring in a home, they may seek to have a probable cause affidavit they prepare reviewed by a neutral judge or magistrate.2

Only if this neutral judge or magistrate finds probable cause, will a search warrant issue allowing the police to then search the home. What this means is if the police search the home without first obtaining a search warrant, any illegal activity or contraband may be suppressed, which effectively means it may not be used as evidence against the alleged defendant to secure a conviction. In most cases, this means the prosecution dismisses the case.

However, a police officer may lawfully search a home and not violate the Fourth Amendment, if he or she has “exigent circumstances”. These are logical and common sense. So for instance, if a police officer hears someone screaming in pain and enters a home to find a person battering the person screaming, this is an “exigent circumstance” that allows a warrantless search.

Ultimately, criminal law has a number of constitutional protections, which if violated, even unintentionally, may provide a defense or basis for the case to be dismissed. For this reason, it is important to select skilled defense counsel who understands the legal limits on police officers to afford all of us constitutional protections. Filing such motions, such as a Motion to Suppress, is the burden of defense counsel. Where this does timely occur, the evidence the case may be suppressed and the matter dismissed.

Ciyou & Dixon, P.C. advocates handle criminal defense cases throughout the State of Indiana. This blog post is written for general educational purposes. This blog is not a solicitation for services or specific legal advice. It is an advertisement.

  1. Suppression under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution is a complex legal and factual analysis with different standards, such as if a person is stopped in a routine traffic stop versus his or her home is searched. This blog addresses suppression in or around someone’s home.
  2. Malone v. State, 882 N.E.2d 784 (Ind.Ct.App.2008).

We Listen & Care

Proven & experienced attorneys successfully advocating & resolving complex cases for over 25 years

Quick Contact

Need to talk now? Fill out the quick form below and we will contact you directly.
Blog Categories

Get In Touch

We're available to answer your questions 24/7.

Contact Us

Please fill out the form below and we will be in touch with you shortly.

Dixon & Moseley, P.C., is a law firm located in Indianapolis, Indiana. We serve clients in six core practice areas: family lawappellate practicefirearms lawgeneral practicepersonal injury and criminal law.

Copyright © 2024 Ciyou & Dixon, P.C., Attorneys at Law. All rights reserved. This Site does not provide legal advice; please review the disclaimer for other limitations. Privacy Policy

Based in Indianapolis and founded in 1995, Dixon & Moseley, P.C. is a niche law firm focused on successfully dealing with the complexities of divorce, high-conflict child custody and family law. Known for their ability to solve extremely complex situations with high quality work and responsiveness, Dixon & Moseley, P.C. will guide you every step of the way. The family law attorneys at Dixon & Moseley, P.C. will help you precisely identify your objectives and the means to reach your desired result. Life is uncertain. Be certain of your counsel. Indianapolis Divorce Attorneys, Dixon & Moseley, P.C.

Indianapolis Divorce Attorneys, Dixon & Moseley, P.C. of Indianapolis, Indiana, offers legal services for Indianapolis, Zionsville, Noblesville, Carmel, Avon, Anderson, Danville, Greenwood, Brownsburg, Geist, Fortville, McCordsville, Muncie, Greenfield, Westfield, Fort Wayne, Fishers, Bloomington, Lafayette, Marion County, Hamilton County, Hendricks County, Allen County, Delaware County, Morgan County, Hendricks County, Boone County, Vigo County, Johnson County, Hancock County, and Tippecanoe County, Indiana.