Call Now

Call Now

Call Now


How Many Issues Can I Raise On Appeal?

How Many Issues Can I Raise On Appeal?

In a civil trial with many issues, such as divorce which may have child support, custody, and property issues decided, a losing party may want to challenge every issue, such as a minimal difference or error in weekly child support to be paid. While there is no express appellate rule prohibiting or limiting the number of issues a party may raise on appeal, raising more than three or four issues on appeal is normally not prudent. This blog explores why limiting the number of issues raised on appeal is practical and prudent.

As a threshold matter, a party that raises numerous issues on appeal is taking a path inconsistent with normal appellate practice. Many appellate briefs only raise one issue. While not in the Appellate Rules, there are many unwritten rules in all professions. This is the case for appellate practice. While there are times raising several issues may be prudent, a brief loaded with many issues presents a “red flag” that the party is unreasonable or otherwise challenging the entire system or trying to “call out” the trial court below. This is because rarely does a judge improperly decide all of the issues in a case. Again, there may be sound reasons to deviate from this unwritten rule, and appellate attorneys do at times, but to the extent, you understand the true “practice” of appellate practice, the more likely you are to make prudent decisions with your appellate counsel on what issues to appeal.

Secondly, as a practical matter, each issue has to set forth the error allegedly made by the trial court under the relevant laws. This is followed by extensive analysis under the controlling standard of review. To make such an argument takes precise writing and a lot of time and words/pages. However, an Appellant’s Brief is limited to 14,000 words or thirty (30) pages,1 whichever is greater. Thus, each issue raised quickly reduces the available words or pages for remaining issues. There is simply no reason to raise an issue if it is not properly analyzed in the briefing as the Court of Appeals is likely to disregard an incomplete analysis; this is because a short legal analysis is typically not useful to show the error of the trial court claimed on appeal and is dismissed by the Court of Appeals as “not cogent” or “waived” for lack of proper analysis.2

Finally, as with most aspects of life, there is a financial cost to each issue added. Most appellate attorneys can narrow most briefs to two or three issues, discarding those issues less likely to win. While this may sound strange, some issues do not have enough value to justify spending the time and money to brief. Further, some issues, even issues where the litigants firmly believe the trial court incorrectly decided the matter, are given deferential treatment and are likely to be affirmed by the Court of Appeals. On the other hand, issues that involve the wrong application of the law are reviewed de novo3 and have a much higher probability of reversal. These are the best issues to appeal for most litigants, although in domestic cases some parents believe they must appeal even a weak case—their right to do so—to know they have done all they can for their children. Ultimately, a weak issue in a brief tends to make the other issues seem weaker too.

These are the unwritten rules of appellate practice that an informed potential appellant should understand to make the most of his or her appeal. The more you understand about the law, the more engaged you can be in making meaningful choices about your case and your future. This blog was written by appellate attorneys at Ciyou & Dixon, P.C. who handle appeals of all types, criminal and civil, from all final orders from Indiana’s ninety-two (92) counties. This blog is written for general educational purposes only. It is not meant or to be construed as legal advice or a solicitation for services. It is an advertisement.

  1. Indiana Rule of Appellate Procedure 43(D).
  2. Martin v. Brown, 129 NE.3d 283 (Ind.Ct.App.2019).
  3. Eagle Aircraft, Inc. v. Trojnar, 983 N.E.2d 648 (Ind.Ct.App.2013).

We Listen & Care

Proven & experienced attorneys successfully advocating & resolving complex cases for over 25 years

Quick Contact

Need to talk now? Fill out the quick form below and we will contact you directly.
Blog Categories

Get In Touch

We're available to answer your questions 24/7.

Contact Us

Please fill out the form below and we will be in touch with you shortly.

Dixon & Moseley, P.C., is a law firm located in Indianapolis, Indiana. We serve clients in six core practice areas: family lawappellate practicefirearms lawgeneral practicepersonal injury and criminal law.

Call Now

Copyright © 2024 Ciyou & Dixon, P.C., Attorneys at Law. All rights reserved. This Site does not provide legal advice; please review the disclaimer for other limitations. Privacy Policy

Based in Indianapolis and founded in 1995, Dixon & Moseley, P.C. is a niche law firm focused on successfully dealing with the complexities of divorce, high-conflict child custody and family law. Known for their ability to solve extremely complex situations with high quality work and responsiveness, Dixon & Moseley, P.C. will guide you every step of the way. The family law attorneys at Dixon & Moseley, P.C. will help you precisely identify your objectives and the means to reach your desired result. Life is uncertain. Be certain of your counsel. Indianapolis Divorce Attorneys, Dixon & Moseley, P.C.

Indianapolis Divorce Attorneys, Dixon & Moseley, P.C. of Indianapolis, Indiana, offers legal services for Indianapolis, Zionsville, Noblesville, Carmel, Avon, Anderson, Danville, Greenwood, Brownsburg, Geist, Fortville, McCordsville, Muncie, Greenfield, Westfield, Fort Wayne, Fishers, Bloomington, Lafayette, Marion County, Hamilton County, Hendricks County, Allen County, Delaware County, Morgan County, Hendricks County, Boone County, Vigo County, Johnson County, Hancock County, and Tippecanoe County, Indiana.